Legal Opinion
Champlin Refining Co. v. Bailey
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 11, 1929No. 167PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
A motion to dismiss the appeal in this ease has been filed on the ground that it comes within Bankruptcy Act, § 24b, as amended by the Act of May 27, 1926 (USCA tit. 11, § 47(b), and that no order was obtained from the Court of Appeals allowing the appeal within the 30 days prescribed by the statute. In opposition to the motion, the appellant contends that the matter sought to be reviewed falls within section 24a (11 USCA § 47(a), in that the litigation presents a “controversy arising in bankruptcy proceedings” rather than the “proceedings of the several inferior…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. VossSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Broders v. LageCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- In re Prudential Lithograph Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- White v. BarnardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
- Williamson v. RichardsonU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1867
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clarke v. BoysenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Currin v. NourseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- In Re TorgovnickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Quarles v. DennisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Schnurr v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.