Legal Opinion

Wilber v. Eicholtz

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from District Gourt of Arayahoe Oounty. The jury rendered a verdict in this case in favor of the plaintiff, Eicholtz, and judgment was entered on the verdict. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

The record in this case discloses that one of the defendants below, George F. Packard, applied to the appellee, Leonard H. Eicholtz, and one Horace A. Gray, since deceased, in May, 1873, for a loan of $2,500, to enable Packard and other farmers of Ballston creek to subscribe and pay for twenty-five shares of stock in an agricultural society named the Colorado Industrial Association. The parties applied to consented to loan the requisite sum if twenty-five farmers of the neighborhood mentioned would execute their joint promissory note for the amount.

A note was prepared and given Packard for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vinton v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Young v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Gaty, Cune & Glasby v. PittmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Gridley v. BaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bradford v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  2. Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Brindisi v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API