Legal Opinion

In re Fry

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 4, 1931No. 2814PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the primary examiner denying all of the claims, 2 to 7, inclusive, in appellant’s application for a patent for an alleged invention relating -to an improvement in covers for back rests of seats.

Claims 2 and 3 may be taken as illustrative. They read:

2. A cover for the bach rest of a seat having a separate seat portion comprising a flexible cover, means for supporting the upper edge of the cover near the top of the back rest, and with its lower edge terminating between the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carlton v. BokeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. Union Shipbuilding Co. v. Boston Iron & Metal Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API