Legal Opinion

Comerica Bank v. Esshaki

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 11, 2018No. 17–11019PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

R. STEVEN WHALEN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Orders Prohibiting Transfer of Assets and Compelling Creditor's Examinations [Doc. # 166], which was referred for hearing and determination under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). For the reasons and *833under the terms set forth below, the motion is GRANTED.

I. FACTS

The Defendants are signators and guarantors of loans from Plaintiff Comerica Bank. They defaulted on these obligations; Plaintiff filed breach of contract claims, and on March 23, 2018, the Court entered a stipulated amended judgment against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. LeGrandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. ConcesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Caisson Corp. v. County West Building Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Credit Lyonnais, S.A. v. Sgc International, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  5. Magnaleasing, Inc. v. Staten Island MallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Detroit Downtown Development AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  2. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. WingetDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  3. JW Gaming Development, LLC v. JamesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  4. JW Gaming Development, LLC v. JamesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API