Legal Opinion

North Front Street

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 1913No. Appeal, No. 70PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 70, Oct. T., 1912, by Frederick Funk, Sr., from judgment of Q. S. Phila. Co., March T., 1909, dismissing exceptions to report of jury of view, In the Matter of the Opening of North Front Street from Luzerne Street to Nicetown Lane and from Hunting Park Avenue to the Boulevard. Exceptions to report of jury of view. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. The court dismissed the exceptions.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 70, Oct. T., 1912, by Frederick Funk, Sr., from judgment of Q. S. Phila. Co., March T., 1909, dismissing exceptions to report of jury of view, In the Matter of the Opening of North Front Street from Luzerne Street to Nicetown Lane and from Hunting Park Avenue to the Boulevard. Exceptions to report of jury of view. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. The court dismissed the exceptions. Error assigned was the order of the court dismissing the exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The councils of the city of Philadelphia, by ordinance approved February 27, 1909, authorized the opening of the part of Front street in question and directed the proper city officers to notify owners of property over which the street passed that at the expiration of three months from the date of said notice the street would be required for public use. The notice to property owners, dated March 19, 1909, was issued in the proper form and is admitted to have been served upon the owners of property on April 3, following, and on the nineteenth day of that month, upon the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitaker v. Phœnixville Bor.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  2. Carroll v. AsburySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Neely v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Gamble v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. Uhler v. CowenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stoever v. GowenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Kaufmann v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API