Legal Opinion

Michel & Pfeffer Iron Works, Inc. v. Ariston, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 9, 1945Published

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint alleging that it fails to state a claim against defendant upon which relief may be granted and for lack of jurisdiction for failure to name the Commissioner of Patents as a necessary party to the action.

The suit is based upon R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, pursuant to which plaintiff seeks an adjudication entitling it to register a composite trade-mark, and as part of the relief sought desires “an order and decree requesting the Commissioner of Patents to issue and register plaintiff’s said trade-mark.”

The mark plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Drackett Co. v. Chamberlain Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Drackett Co. v. Chamberlain Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
  3. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  4. Drackett Co. v. Chamberlain Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API