Legal Opinion

AKOL v. CARNEY

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 7, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00026Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ASHOL AKOL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:20-cv-26-SPB ) THOMAS CARNEY, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This pro se civil action was initiated by Plaintiff Ashol Akol on January 31, 2020. ECF No. 1. Appended to Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was a complaint directed against Thomas Carney based upon an adverse ruling that the Defendant had issued in his capacity as a magisterial district judge. By Memorandum Opinion and Order issued on June 5, 2020, ECF Nos. [3] and [4], the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API