Griffin v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.
From a conviction of the offense denounced and provided for in section 4925 of the Code 1923, this appeal was taken. The indictment charged these two appellants, in substance, that, with the purpose to hinder, delay, or defraud D. W. Powell, who had a lawful and valid claim thereto, under a written instrument, lien created by law for rent or advances, or other lawful valid claim, verbal or written, did sell or remove personal property consisting of six bales of cotton of the value of $100, the said Jesse N. Griffin and Odie Taylor having at the time a knowledge of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Mitchell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
- Cauley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Balkum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pugh v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964
- State v. QuinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Williams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Singley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Jolly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.