Legal Opinion
Edward Rische & Sons v. Planters National Bank
Texas Supreme Court
Decided April 22, 1892No. 7396PublishedCited by 12 opinions
No statement is necessary.
1Opinion of the Court
STAYTOR, Chief Justice.-
— This action was brought by appellee,, as indorsee of an accepted bill of exchange. The bill of exchange and acceptance sued on were as follows:
“$1090.00. “Richmond, Va., March 31, 1885.
“Three months after date, pay to the order of ourselves ten hundred and ninety dollars, value received, and charge the same to account of
“Hobace Blaokmub & Co.,
“M. P. Blaokmub, Atty.
11 To JEdw. Rische & Sons, San Antonio, Texas.”
Accepted across the face thus:
“Accepted: Edw. Rische & Sons.”
Indorsed thus:
“Hobace Blaokmub & Co.,
“M. P. Blaokmub, Atty.”
The petition alleged, that appellee…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Juilliard v. . ChaffeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Collins v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Hays v. . HathornNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Bookstaver v. . JayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Johnson v. McMurrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Barton v. Farmers' State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Daniel v. SpaethCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Clay-Butler Lumber Co. v. W. H. Pickering Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Hart v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Rowe v. GohlmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.