Legal Opinion

Edward Rische & Sons v. Planters National Bank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1892No. 7396PublishedCited by 12 opinions

No statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTOR, Chief Justice.-

— This action was brought by appellee,, as indorsee of an accepted bill of exchange. The bill of exchange and acceptance sued on were as follows:

“$1090.00. “Richmond, Va., March 31, 1885.
“Three months after date, pay to the order of ourselves ten hundred and ninety dollars, value received, and charge the same to account of
“Hobace Blaokmub & Co.,
“M. P. Blaokmub, Atty.

11 To JEdw. Rische & Sons, San Antonio, Texas.”

Accepted across the face thus:

“Accepted: Edw. Rische & Sons.”

Indorsed thus:

“Hobace Blaokmub & Co.,
“M. P. Blaokmub, Atty.”

The petition alleged, that appellee…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Juilliard v. . ChaffeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Collins v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Hays v. . HathornNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Bookstaver v. . JayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Johnson v. McMurrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Barton v. Farmers' State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Daniel v. SpaethCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Clay-Butler Lumber Co. v. W. H. Pickering Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. Hart v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Rowe v. GohlmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API