McCoy v. City National Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action begun in tbe municipal court of the city of Duluth to recover $59.41. The case was tried before Windom, J., who at the close of the testimony denied plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict and granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.
Read the full summary
Action begun in tbe municipal court of the city of Duluth to recover $59.41. The case was tried before Windom, J., who at the close of the testimony denied plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict and granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, he appealed to the district court for that county, where the order of the municipal court was affirmed, Ensign, Cant and Hughes, JJ. From the order of the district court, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
On September 7, 1911, one R>. O. Hawkins brought suit against the King Commission Co. (a corporation), in the municipal court of the city of Duluth, and garnished the City National Bank. On September 23, the bank disclosed an indebtedness to. the defendant, the King Commission Co., of $59.41. Thereafter the main action was tried, and, on November 17, 1911, judgment was entered in favor of Hawkins and against the King Commission Co. (a corporation), for the sum of $165.01, and against the garnishee, the City National *457Bank, for the sum of $59.41. The bank paid and satisfied the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Browning v. HinkleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- First State Bank v. PedersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Berg v. Pittsburgh Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mutual Service Casualty Insurance v. OverholserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Longman v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924