Legal Opinion

St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Baughman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 9, 1983No. 41-748, CA A21589PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

This action arose out of defendants’ claim of coverage under a fire insurance policy issued by plaintiff. Defendants filed proofs of loss for $111,250 for personal property and $109,819 for business interruption caused by a fire at their furniture store. Plaintiff rejected defendants’ claim' and filed this action for a declaratory judgment, seeking a declaration that there was no coverage under the insurance policy.

Plaintiffs complaint raised two claims to support its refusal to pay defendants’ loss. First, “any loss suffered as a result of the fire was intentionally caused by [defendants].”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blake v. Roy Webster OrchardsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ballard v. Rickabaugh Orchards, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Richmond v. Fields Chevrolet Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Meislahn v. DemorestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Fickert v. GallagherOregon Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. PHOMVONGSA BY PHOMVONGSA v. PhounsavethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Hall v. WarringtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API