St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Baughman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
This action arose out of defendants’ claim of coverage under a fire insurance policy issued by plaintiff. Defendants filed proofs of loss for $111,250 for personal property and $109,819 for business interruption caused by a fire at their furniture store. Plaintiff rejected defendants’ claim' and filed this action for a declaratory judgment, seeking a declaration that there was no coverage under the insurance policy.
Plaintiffs complaint raised two claims to support its refusal to pay defendants’ loss. First, “any loss suffered as a result of the fire was intentionally caused by [defendants].”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blake v. Roy Webster OrchardsOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Ballard v. Rickabaugh Orchards, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Richmond v. Fields Chevrolet Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Meislahn v. DemorestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Fickert v. GallagherOregon Supreme Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- PHOMVONGSA BY PHOMVONGSA v. PhounsavethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Hall v. WarringtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986