Legal Opinion

In Re Davis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 24, 2000No. 25056PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and disciplinary counsel have entered into an agreement under Rule 21 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413, SCACR. In the agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to a public reprimand. We accept the agreement and publicly reprimand respondent.

Respondent was employed by the law firm of E.W. Cromartie, II, in Columbia, as an associate whose primary duty was real estate transactions. Respondent had the authority to sign on a real estate trust account maintained by the law firm at BB & T Bank in…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re CromartieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. In re DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. In re ZennerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API