Legal Opinion

Erling v. Haman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1966No. 8307Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

MURRAY, Judge.

Plaintiffs and appellants have petitioned this court for rehearing only with respect to that part of the opinion in the above entitled action, wherein the court stated as follows (with respect to the order denying motion to vacate order appointing special master) :

“Of the three orders above listed, the first we find it unnecessary to deal with.”

The petitioning counsel is correct to the extent that this court should have included reasons for stating that it was unnecessary to deal with this point.

The order denying the motion to vacate order appointing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Swiggum v. Valley Investment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Union Brokerage Co. v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Swiggum v. Valley Investment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API