United States of America, Ex Rel., Richard J. Newell v. Larry Mizell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPRECHER, Circuit Judge.
We reverse the granting of a writ of habeas corpus because, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we cannot conclude that any rational trier of fact could not have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
I
The petitioner, Richard J. Newell, was found guilty of possession of more than 500 grams of a substance containing cannabis in violation of Ill.Rev.Stat., ch. 56V2, § 704(e), and was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment by a state court in Adams County, Illinois. The conviction was affirmed by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Donald Earl SpannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- People v. KlineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- People v. HeringAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. Bernard Wandick v. James A. Chrans & Neil HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Rodriguez v. YoungDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1989