Legal Opinion

United States of America, Ex Rel., Richard J. Newell v. Larry Mizell

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 14, 1982No. 80-2669PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPRECHER, Circuit Judge.

We reverse the granting of a writ of habeas corpus because, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we cannot conclude that any rational trier of fact could not have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

I

The petitioner, Richard J. Newell, was found guilty of possession of more than 500 grams of a substance containing cannabis in violation of Ill.Rev.Stat., ch. 56V2, § 704(e), and was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment by a state court in Adams County, Illinois. The conviction was affirmed by the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. Donald Earl SpannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  4. People v. KlineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. People v. HeringAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. Bernard Wandick v. James A. Chrans & Neil HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Rodriguez v. YoungDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API