Legal Opinion
Hall Dadeland Towers Associates v. Hardeman
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided May 8, 1990No. CA3-87-2433-FPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT W. PORTER, District Judge.
On September 5 and 6, 1989, this cause came on to be heard by the Court. After hearing the testimony and after reviewing the parties’ briefs, the applicable law, and all the relevant facts, exhibits, and depositions, the Court is of the opinion that Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs Donald W. and Donna M. Hardeman (hereinafter “the Defendants” or “the Hardemans”) should recover from the Plaintiff, Hall Dadeland Towers Associates, and Third-Party Defendants Craig Hall and Hall 85 Associates, as set forth below. 1
I. Factual…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Alicia Morales v. James A. Turman, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Executivedirector of the Texas Youth CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,675 W. Monroe Stephenson v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. And James E. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Morales v. TurmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York v. Peter E. Blum, Peter E. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Carr v. Hunt, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Karl Rove & Company v. Richard Thornburgh, Richard Thornburgh, Cross-Appellee, and Raymond P. Dimuzio, Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Wood County Airport Authority v. Crown Airways, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996
- Ganz v. Lyons Partnership, L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1997