Legal Opinion

Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Airgas, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided February 15, 2011No. Civil Action 5249-CC, 5256-CCPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHANDLER, Chancellor

[[Image here]]

[[Image here]]

This case poses the following fundamental question: Can a board of directors, acting in good faith and with a reasonable factual basis for its decision, when faced with a structurally non-coercive, all-cash, fully financed tender offer directed to the stockholders of the corporation, keep a poison pill in place so as to prevent the stockholders from making their own decision about whether they want to tender their shares — even after the incumbent board has lost one election contest, a full year has gone by since the offer was first made…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  2. Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  3. Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  4. Unitrin, Inc. v. American General Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  5. Moran v. Household International, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Trados Inc. Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  2. In re Orchard Enterprises, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  3. In re Rural Metro Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  4. Com. v. Cabell, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Com. v. Lugo, O.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API