Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Airgas, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHANDLER, Chancellor
[[Image here]]
[[Image here]]
This case poses the following fundamental question: Can a board of directors, acting in good faith and with a reasonable factual basis for its decision, when faced with a structurally non-coercive, all-cash, fully financed tender offer directed to the stockholders of the corporation, keep a poison pill in place so as to prevent the stockholders from making their own decision about whether they want to tender their shares — even after the incumbent board has lost one election contest, a full year has gone by since the offer was first made…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
- Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Unitrin, Inc. v. American General Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Moran v. Household International, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re Trados Inc. Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- In re Orchard Enterprises, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
- In re Rural Metro Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
- Com. v. Cabell, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Com. v. Lugo, O.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.