Legal Opinion
Thieme v. Seattle-First National Bank
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 17, 1972No. 497-3PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
Plaintiffs, Gaylord G. Thieme and Russell L. Armstrong, brought this action against defendant, Seattle-First National Bank (hereinafter called “SFNB”), to recover the payment of their check for $3,500 upon an unauthorized endorsement. SFNB cross claimed against co-defendant Bank of Everett for any loss it might sustain in the event judgment was entered against it. The trial court entered judgment for plaintiffs against SFNB, but denied a recovery on the cross claim. SFNB appeals.
The facts are not in substantial dispute. Plaintiffs were partners operating a business known as Dune Buggy Sales…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Society National Bank of Cleveland v. Capital National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- Goodfellow v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- First National Bank of Yukon v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
3Cited by11 opinions
- Twellman v. Lindell Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Maddox Ex Rel. Fitzgerald v. First Westroads BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- Seattle-First National Bank v. Pacific National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Atlas Building Supply Co. v. First Independent BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Zambia National Commercial Bank Ltd. v. Fidelity International BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.