Legal Opinion

Creme Lure Co. v. Schwartztrauber

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided August 29, 1966No. Civ. No. 6-1638-C-2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HANSON, District Judge.

This is a ruling on an action to set aside the decisions of the Trademark and Appeal Board in Interference No. 6,056 and Opposition No. 42,428 wherein registration of the trademark “Du-Dad” was denied to the plaintiff and granted to the defendants. This is also a ruling on the counterclaim.

The plaintiff makes the following legal contentions:

1. Plaintiff has adopted and used the marks “Du-Dad” and “Mad-Dad” in interstate commerce within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. § 45 as early as August 1961.

2. Prior to August 1961 Defendants have not, within the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pagliero v. Wallace China Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  2. American Auto. Ass'n (Incorporated) v. SpiegelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  3. Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
  4. Aladdin Mfg. Co. v. Mantle Lamp Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  5. New England Duplicating Co., Inc. v. MendesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stockdale v. Agrico Chemical Co., Div. of Con. Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1972
  2. Weems Industries, Inc. v. Teknor Apex CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API