Legal Opinion

State v. Darby

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1969No. 1955PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

Jack Darby was charged and convicted by a jury of robbery, a felony under A.R.S. § 13-641. He appeals his conviction contending the trial court erred in failing to suppress the in-court identification testimony of two witnesses who had identified the defendant at a “tainted” police lineup, and in refusing to give certain instructions requested by the defense.

About 2:00 a. m. on the morning of September 11, 1967, Darby and another subject, both of whom answered the descriptions of the two men who had minutes before robbed a coffee shop at Central and Osborn Avenues in Phoenix,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. State v. DessureaultArizona Supreme Court · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. FlynnArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. DowningArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API