Legal Opinion
Berger v. Bishop
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided June 22, 1903Published
At Law. Action to recover penalty under Sections 4 and 5 of Act of March 3, 1903. (Val. 32, Part 1. P. 1213, U. S. Stats.)
1Opinion of the CourtEster, J.
This is an- action at law brought by thei plaintiff under the1 provisions of Sections 4 and 5 of an Act of Congress, dated March 3, 1903, entitled “An Act to- regúlate the immigration, of aliens into tire United States.” (U. S. Statutes, 1902-3, page 1213).
The complaint alleges that—
“Continuously from November 1, 1902, or thereabouts, up to May 1, 1903, the defendant did knowingly encourage, and solicit the migration and importation into the; United States of America from a foreign country, to-wit: the empire of Korea, of one John Doe 1st, a foreigner and an alien, being a Korean'…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Lem Moon Sing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Benson v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.