Underwood v. Rollins

hDREW, Judge.

From the judgment awarding the contractor, Lee Underwood, $33,000 pursuant to a land-clearing contract, the landowner, *170Benny J. Rollins appealed and claimed that the trial court made erroneous factual findings and incorrectly denied his recon-ventional demand. The plaintiff, Underwood, claimed that Rollins owed him $40,000 (less a credit for $10,000 already paid) for his clearing 40 acres of Rollins’ property at the agreed upon price of $1000 per acre. In his answer and reconventional demand against Underwood, Robins contended that the parties agreed Underwood was to clear a…