Legal Opinion

Scott & Mayhall v. Lubbock Grain & Coal Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1923No. 3382PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Judge McLBNDON

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals.

This case arises upon certified questions from the Court of Civil Appeals. The controlling facts, as shown by the certificate, are:

“The appellee, Lubbock Grain & Coal Company, sued appellants, Scott & Mayhall, to recover as damages $712.75, alleged to have been paid on a shipment of cane seed. This sum is alleged to be due by reason of the shortage in the weight of the seed at destination— Lubbock. That the appellant had guaranteed in writing the grades and weights at destination, which was alleged to be in Lubbock…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Seley & Early v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Gottlieb v. DismukesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Robinson & Martin v. Houston & Texas Central RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Callender, Holder & Co. v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Berlowitz v. StandleyTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Marcus v. ArmerTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. F. C. Pennington Produce Co. v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Patterson v. Smith Bros. Grain Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Browning-Ferris MacH. Co. v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API