Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Barrett

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1931No. Appeal, 42PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

The issues raised on the scire facias sur recognizance in this case were tried by the court below without a jury, upon agreement filed, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. The surety company, defendant, appeals and propounds but two questions: (1) Does the statute of limitations bar the action because brought more than two years after the forfeiture?; and (2) Can the trial court, in a suit on a forfeited recognizance, consider the circumstances of the case, and moderate or remit the forfeiture? The court below gave a negative answer to each of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FogelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Foulke v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  3. De Haven v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  4. Mishler v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  5. Commonwealth v. BalsamoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Spain's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Commonwealth v. JakubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Commonwealth, to Use v. Davis (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Charles & Martin Skubic Post LicenseSusquehanna County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API