Commonwealth v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
The issues raised on the scire facias sur recognizance in this case were tried by the court below without a jury, upon agreement filed, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. The surety company, defendant, appeals and propounds but two questions: (1) Does the statute of limitations bar the action because brought more than two years after the forfeiture?; and (2) Can the trial court, in a suit on a forfeited recognizance, consider the circumstances of the case, and moderate or remit the forfeiture? The court below gave a negative answer to each of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FogelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Foulke v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- De Haven v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Mishler v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Commonwealth v. BalsamoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Spain's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth v. JakubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Commonwealth, to Use v. Davis (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Charles & Martin Skubic Post LicenseSusquehanna County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.