Legal Opinion

City of Columbus v. DeLong

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1962No. 37066Published

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

The affidavit filed against the defendant must be governed and limited by the ordinance on which it is predicated, and such affidavit is framed under the part of the ordinance relating to a “prostitute * * * wandering about the streets.”

Undoubtedly, in the exercise of the police power, a municipality may adopt and enforce ordinances designed to inhibit or curtail the illicit activities of prostitutes, but such ordinances should be reasonably specific, and, in our view, the ordinance in controversy, as worded, is too indefinite, restrictive and liberty depriving to constitute a valid use of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. State v. . AsheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API