Legal Opinion

Frazier v. F. Strauss & Son, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1937No. 5312PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff’s application is addressed solely to the sustaining by this court of exceptions of no cause and no right of action filed on behalf of A. T. Stout and his insurer, the Travelers Insurance Company. The application for rehearing on behalf of F. Strauss & Son, Inc., and Sun Indemnity Company of New York and a copious, printed brief of 68 pages in its support, embraces and discusses the whole field of facts involved in the case. It is conceded, and properly so, that no question of law is involved. After all is said and done, as we endeavored to demonstrate in our opinion, the pivotal…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beck v. LovellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Thomas H. Poppell and Mrs. Nell D. Poppell, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Madere v. TranchinaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API