Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Siegel

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCube, J.

This is an action for an injunction wherein the plaintiffs claim that a covenant in their written lease protects them against competing tenants in the building 116-16 Liberty Avenue, Brooklyn, 1ST. Y., selling merchandise and wares in which the plaintiffs traffic. That covenant follows: ‘ ‘ The landlord agrees not to rent any portion of the building * * * for the sale of children’s specialties, women’s wear such as hosiery and underwear or infants’ shoes There is no dis*1069pute about the fact that defendants are prosecuting the line of business mentioned in the covenant.

At the time the lease was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hodge v. . SloanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Peoples Trust Co. v. Schultz Novelty & Sporting Goods Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Rubel Bros. v. Dumont Coal & Ice Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Neiman-Marcus Company v. HexterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Alexander S. v. Arnold ConstableNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  3. Banos v. WinkelsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API