Truxton v. Fait & Slagle Co.
Supreme Court of Delaware
Writ of error to the Superior Court of Sussex County. See statement of facts in opinion of court.
1Opinion of the Court
Edward Ridgeey, Esq., Judge Ad Litem,
delivering the opinion of the court:
This was an action of replevin brought by Fait & Slagle Company, a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Maryland, the plaintiff below, to the October Term, 1895, of the Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for Sussex County, against Joseph D. Truxton and Planner J. Williams, defendants below, plaintiffs in error, for the recovery of ninety-six thousand tin cans, alleged to have been sold by the said Fait *492and Slagle Company to James B. Morrow and William J. Coulbourn, partners, trading under the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Devoe v. . BrandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Oswego Starch Factory v. LendrumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Poor v. WoodburnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
- Schweizer v. TracyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- American Merchants' Union Express Co. v. WillsieIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schramm v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Lewes Sand Co. v. GravesSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939
- State v. CareyDelaware Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1935
- American Ins. Co. v. IaconiSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- American Insurance v. IaconiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.