Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 16, 2019No. B290506PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

*603We confront a direct and widening court conflict over whether defendants who made a plea deal must obtain a certificate of probable cause before asking, on appeal, for a remand for resentencing under Senate Bill No. 1393 (2017-2018 Reg. Sess.), which we call SB 1393. The Supreme Court has taken up but not yet decided this conflict. We join with the courts ruling a certificate of probable cause is necessary. We dismiss this appeal because Christopher Williams never tried to obtain a certificate of probable cause. All statutory citations are to the Penal Code.

I

We summarize some factual…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Doe v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. SheltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Harris v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. People v. EllisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. People v. MatthewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. Rash CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API