People v. Williams
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.
*603We confront a direct and widening court conflict over whether defendants who made a plea deal must obtain a certificate of probable cause before asking, on appeal, for a remand for resentencing under Senate Bill No. 1393 (2017-2018 Reg. Sess.), which we call SB 1393. The Supreme Court has taken up but not yet decided this conflict. We join with the courts ruling a certificate of probable cause is necessary. We dismiss this appeal because Christopher Williams never tried to obtain a certificate of probable cause. All statutory citations are to the Penal Code.
I
We summarize some factual…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Doe v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. SheltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Harris v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. EllisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- People v. MatthewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. Rash CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020