Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Mays

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 17, 2011Published

1Dissent

Fahey and Martoche, JJ.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent. In our view, Supreme Court improperly delegated control of a critical portion of the proceedings to the prosecutor insofar as it allowed the prosecutor to fashion responses to juror questions and guide the jurors through the playback of video recordings. Consequently, we would reverse the judgment of conviction and grant defendant a new trial on those counts of the indictment of which he was convicted.

In 2007, defendant was tried with respect to a series of charges arising from two incidents of robbery that occurred in Monroe…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. AhmedNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. BonaparteNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. People v. LykesNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API