Legal Opinion
Stoutmire v. Strickland
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 17, 1984No. 83 C 6900PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Esther and Ruben Stoutmire (“Stout-mires”) seek damages and injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (“Section 1982”) and the fair housing provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3631. 1 Defendant Quasem Barakat (“Barakat”) 2 has renewed his motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 39 for a trial by jury of all issues in the case. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, Barakat’s motion is denied (at least on the present showing or lack of one).
Background
On September 30, 1983 Stoutmires filed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Billy Merritt v. Gordon H. FaulknerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Noddings Investment Group, Inc. v. KelleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Nur v. Blake Development Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987