J.R. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
By petition for writ of mandamus, J.R. seeks to compel the trial court to allow him to attend arraignment in person. We hold that an arraignment is a critical stage in a delinquency proceeding and that Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.070, read in conjunction with Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.100(a), requires the juvenile to be present at an arraignment unless the juvenile waives the right to be present or the court finds that the juvenile’s mental or physical condition is such that a court appearance is not in the juvenile’s best interests. Because the arraignment has already…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Muhammad v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- N.W. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- RR v. PortesyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- T.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
3Cited by6 opinions
- M.A.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Commonwealth v. B.J.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2007
- M.W. v. Department of Juvenile JusticeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- S.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Com. v. BJKentucky Supreme Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.