Legal Opinion
Harris v. Nichols
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 21, 1931No. 6 Div. 872PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The bill seeks the cancellation of a deed and mortgage executed by complainant to respondent, resting upon the right of rescission by reason of alleged fraudulent representations. Bullard Shoals Mining Co. v. Spencer, 208 Ala. 663, 95 So. 1; Merritt v. Ehrman, 116 Ala. 278, 22 So. 514; National Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Propst, 219 Ala. 437, 122 So. 656; Hyman v. Langston, 210 Ala. 509, 98 So. 564.
It appears from the bill that in the transaction here complained of, which consisted in an exchange of certain real estate between the parties, respondent conveyed to complainant one hundred and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grider v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- McDonald v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Merritt v. EhrmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. PropstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Mathews v. J. F. Carroll Merc. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hudson v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Shepherd v. KendrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Buettner Bros. v. Good Hope Missionary Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Glenn v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Terrell v. Marion CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.