Legal Opinion

Ori v. Steele

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 25, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge.

The question is whether the parties are bound by a written contract as was adjudged or by an oral novation under which appellant would be entitled to claim on a quantum meruit basis.

Appellant, Frank Ori, a builder, entered into a written contract with appellees George E. and Marilyn Henry Steele for the construction of a house at the price of $19,400. Incorporated into the contract were detailed plans and specifications. The contract also provided that the Steeles, without invalidating the contract, could order extra work or make changes by altering, adding to, or deducting…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. B. F. M. Building, Inc. v. TriceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API