Legal Opinion
Ronald Lee Hileman v. Lawrence Knable, Jr., Police Officer, Andrew Kurey, Police Officer
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 18, 1968No. 17038_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Before BIGGS, KALODNER and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.
2Per curiam
Hileman appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint and denying his motion for additional findings of fact. The suit was brought under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the court below held that Hileman’s suit was barred by the applicable statute of limitations and consequently granted appellees’, Knable’s and Kurey’s, motion to dismiss the complaint.
The issue in the case at bar is whether the trial court applied the proper statute of limitation. The complaint alleges:
“3. Plaintiff was illegally arrested by…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Jones v. BombeckCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Henig v. OdoriosoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
4Cited by32 opinions
- Henry Howell v. CataldiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Charles Baker v. F & F Investment, Sidney Clark v. Universal Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Lester Smith v. City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Polite v. DiehlCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Gagliardi v. LynnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.