Legal Opinion

State v. Friedmann

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 5, 1978No. 1392PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BISSETT, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying the defendants’ motion to dissolve a temporary injunction. We affirm.

On August 8, 1955, the State of Texas acquired, through condemnation, a roadway easement over certain lands owned in fee by Ralph J. Friedmann and wife, Sarah Friedmann, plaintiffs-appellees in this appeal. On September 28, 1976, the State and the City of Brownsville entered into a “multiple use agreement”, pursuant to which the City commenced the construction of a building denominated a “tourist center” upon a certain portion of the land included in the roadway…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Transport Co. of Texas v. Robertson TransportsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Janus Films, Inc. v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Dallas General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Wamix, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Schroeder v. BrandonTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State v. Cook United, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tober v. Turner of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Garcia-Marroquin v. Nueces County Bail Bond Board, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
  3. Cellular Marketing, Inc. v. Houston Cellular Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Ballenger v. Ballenger, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  5. Clark v. SalinasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API