Smith v. Colvin

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Dayna Charlayne Smith (“Smith”) seeks judicial review pursuant to the Social Security Act (“Act”),1 more specifically 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1388(c)(3), of the final decision of then Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue (“Commissioner”) 2 denying Smith’s claim for social *892security disability income (“SSDI”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”). Smith has moved for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56 or alternatively to remand for further proceedings, while Commissioner seeks affirmance of her…