Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Greenlee v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 1976No. 3-475A63Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Opinion Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part

Staton, P.J.

— I concur with the majority opinion that the conviction should be affirmed, but I dissent from the majority opinion where it affirms the ruling of the trial court upon the sexual deviant petition.

Greenlee should have been sentenced under the Criminal Sexual Deviancy Statutes.1 IC 1971, 35-11-3.1-1 (Burns Code Ed.) defines “criminal sexual deviant” as “any person over the age of sixteen (16) years who has been convicted of a sexual offense or an offense which directly involved the commission of an illegal sexual act, . . .” (My…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bynum v. LaPorte Superior Court No. 1Indiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Pryor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Kelley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  4. STATE EX REL. SAVERY ETC. v. Criminal Court of Marion CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Utley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API