Legal Opinion

Lowe v. Schwartz

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 2007No. 24347PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] On August 23, 2006, Karl M. Schwartz (Schwartz) filed a motion in the South Dakota Fifth Judicial Circuit for relief from the circuit court’s October 17, 2005 order, compelling him to name his ex-wife, Mary C. Lowe (Lowe), as the beneficiary of and pay the premiums on a former-spouse-protection annuity related to his United States Coast Guard retirement plan. On August 28, 2006, Lowe filed a motion to amend a November 15, 2004 judgment and decree of divorce and order Schwartz to continue her beneficiary status and to increase alimony. The motions were heard on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fox v. FoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Sanford v. SanfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Saxvik v. SaxvikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Jameson v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Foley v. FoleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cook v. CookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Vandyke v. Jieun ChoiSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Leedom v. LeedomSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Moore v. MooreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Lowe v. SchwartzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API