Legal Opinion

D'Andrea v. AT&T Michigan

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2010No. Docket No. 288483PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, P.J.

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s order that granted summary disposition to defendant, AT&T Michigan. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I. FACTS

Plaintiffs contend that AT&T’s installation of new and additional utility equipment on an easement on their property, a private residence in the city of Grosse Pointe Farms, constitutes a continuing trespass. The lot on which plaintiffs reside is part of a platted subdivision that was recorded in 1948. The plat shows a dedication of a six-foot “Easement for Public…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. West v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Lash v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Blackhawk Development Corp. v. Village of DexterMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Schadewald v. BruleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Little v. KinMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ben Joseph Burkhart Trust v. Daniel CramerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Ben Joseph Burkhart Trust v. Daniel CramerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Kelly Kay v. Jeffrey a HeynMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Ralph Steven Smith v. Joseph W StraughnMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API