Legal Opinion

Utah Pizza Service, Inc. v. Heigel

District Court, D. Utah

Decided February 19, 1992No. Civ. 91-C-876BPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

BENSON, District Judge.

The Court has before it defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Venue. The motion is opposed by plaintiffs Utah Pizza Service, Inc. and Bruce O. Palanske, and defendant Vicki N. Heigel.

BACKGROUND

Defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, a Michigan corporation, is a national franchisor of Little Caesar Restaurants. Plaintiff Utah Pizza Service, Inc., a Utah corporation, is a franchisee of Little Caesar, operating approximately 41 Little Caesar Restaurants in Utah and Wyoming. Plaintiff Bruce Palanske is the chief operating…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. In Re Ricoh CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. John Boutari and Son, Wines and Spirits, S.A. v. Attiki Importers and Distributors IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Excell, Inc. v. Sterling Boiler & Mechanical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  3. Berg v. MTC Electronics Technologies Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. CQL Original Products, Inc. v. National Hockey League Players' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Banco Popular De Puerto Rico v. Airborne Group PLCDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API