Swift v. Van Dyke
Supreme Court of Georgia
Levy and claim. Before Judge Lumpkin. Fulton superior court. September term, 1895.
1Opinion of the Court
Lumpkin, Justice.
Whenever the General Assembly expressly undertakes to amend or repeal an existing statute or section of the code, it must comply with the provisions of par. 17, sec. 7, art. 3, of the constitution, which declares that “no- law, or section of the code, shall be amended or repealed by mere reference to its title, or to the number of the section of the code) but the amending or repealing act shall distinctly describe the law to be amended or repealed, as well as the alteration to be made.” Oode, §5076. It by no means follows, however, that it is not within the constitutional…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. Southern Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Bagwell v. Town of LawrencevilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
3Cited by17 opinions
- Crovatt v. MasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Collins v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Edalgo v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- State Board of Education v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.