Legal Opinion

Slyfield v. Willard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1906No. 6104PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered August 7, 1905, in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits, before the court without a jury, in an action on promissory notes and to foreclose a chattel mortgage upon a leasehold, and the furnishings of a lodging house;

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

This action was commenced to. recover upon a series of eight promissory notes, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage covering the lease and furniture of a lodging house. All of the notes were dated November 11, 1904, and were secured by said mortgage. One of them was for $50 and was made payable January 11, 1905. Six of them were for $150 each and payable respectively on May 11, June 11, July 11, Ang. 11, Sep; 11, and Oct. 11, 1905. One noto was for $100 and payable Nov. 11, 1905. Suit was begun May 24, 1905. During the trial the plaintiff was permitted to amend her complaint by inserting the…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mayhugh v. CoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. First National Bank v. FordWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Clambey v. CoplandWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Chames v. DeMayoSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  5. Lingle State Bank of Lingle v. PodolakWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API