Conaway v. Nickles
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Dissent
The contract in this case contains conflicting provisions. One provision states that, from the proceeds of the loan secured by the first mortgage, the buyer will make $7,000 worth of repairs to the house. Another provision states that the seller shall not be required to make any repairs to the property. The conflict in the two provisions arises from the fact that, if the buyer uses $7,000 of the loan proceeds to make repairs, the seller will realize $7,000 less from the sale of the house; the seller will, in effect, therefore, be "making repairs" to the property.
The trial court determined…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Heyman Cohen & Sons, Inc. v. M. Lurie Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Sealing Equip. Products Co. v. VelardeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Rivers v. Oakwood CollegeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Decker v. MARSHALL-DeKALB ELEC. CO-OP.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995