Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Jordan

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1978No. Docket 77-3178Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partR. M. Maher, P. J.

An examination of the record indicates that the trial judge failed to comply substantially with GCR 1963, 785.8(2), 785.9. I agree, therefore, that this case should be remanded to the trial court for resentencing in conformance with, these court rules. See People v Elijah Smith, 68 Mich App 551; 243 NW2d 681 (1976).

However, since defendant was a repeat offender and not an habitual offender, I believe that the indeterminate sentence act does apply to his situation and that his minimum prison sentence of 1 year and 11 months therefore violates People v Tanner, 387 Mich 683; 199 NW2d 202 (1972).…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. TannerMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. RedwineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. Reginald HarrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. ReeseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API