Shockley Et Ux. v. Winkler Et Ux
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STRUM, Circuit Judge.
In a tenant’s action pursuant to sec. 205 of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, now incorporated in 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1895, the trial court found that on a lease of a rent controlled apartment owned by the defendant landlords, extending from October 20, 1947, to June 1, 1948, the plaintiff tenants paid the defendant landlords $1350 as rent, which sum was $1035 in excess of the maximum allowed by sec. 204(b) of said Act.
The trial court found that though the violation was not “wilful,” the landlords failed to take practical precautions against occur rence of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Matheny v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Berry v. HellerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Paray Realty Corp. v. GoodwineAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1949
- Citrone v. PalladinoNew York Supreme Court · 1947
3Cited by2 opinions
- Severo Vargas v. SánchezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1957
- Vargas v. SánchezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1957