Legal Opinion
Iannella v. Johnson
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 2, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Eastwood, J.
Prosecutors seek, through the medium of a writ of certiorari, to review the legality and'validity of certain summary proceedings conducted before the respondent Arvid Johnson, Recorder of the Township of Piscataway, wherein they were convicted on or about October 8th, .1946, of violating a zoning ordinance of the Township of Piscataway. In the proceedings before the Recorder prosecutors were charged with operating a slaughier-house and the slaughter of animals thereon, on September 21st, 1946, contrary to the provisions of section 9 of said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Home Fuel Oil Co. v. Borough of Glen RockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Parker v. Borough of Point PleasantSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Crescent Hill, Inc. v. Borough of AllendaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schultze v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Felix v. Superior Court of County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Bd. of Ed. of Fort Lee v. Mayor, Etc., of Fort LeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Jones v. ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, LONG BEACH TP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- State v. KresslerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958