Benoit v. State

Alexander, J.,

delivered a dissenting opinion.

It seems to me that the momentum engendered by the views expressed in the controlling opinions in the companion eases (Taylor v. State, 194 Miss. 1, 11 So. (2d) 663, and Cummings v. State, 194 Miss. 59, 11 So. (2d) 683, decided this day) should have been checked before encompassing the appellant here.

From the pamphlet “Consolation,” made the basis of a fear of revolution or sedition, it may be safely assumed that the state has culled its most potent paragraphs. These selections are set forth in the indictment and quoted in other opinions herein. In…