Legal Opinion
Windsor Print Works v. C. F. Hathaway Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 17, 1923No. 1602PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit on an account annexed to recover $24,044.06 for goods sold and delivered. The defense was rescission and return of the goods because not conformable to the contract, with a counterclaim or set-off for $4,358.09 paid for other goods of the same kind before discovery of alleged latent defects. The de- ' fendant prevailed, and had a verdict against the plaintiff for the >money defendant had paid.
*2The case involved two separate contracts: First, .in April, 1920, the defendant ordered 18 cases of percale shirting for delivery in October, November, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Littlejohn v. . ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Oakland Sugar Mill Co. v. Fred W. Wolf Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Hess v. KaufherrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Pitcher v. WebberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
- Kingsley v. WallisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1836
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. GriffinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Dow v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Felbrant v. AbleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Soronen v. Olde Milford InnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- State v. LoufNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.