Legal Opinion

Brady v. Phillips Mule Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 7, 1921No. 12161PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Complaint; from Gwinnett superior court — Judge Cobb. January 12, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. The rule of law, that, where payment upon a written evidence of debt is made to one who purports to act as the holder’s agent but fails to produce the writing, the burden is upon the debtor to prove the agent’s authority to receive the payment (Civil Code of 1910, § 3578), has no application where payment on a note payable to a partnership is made to one. of the partners. In such a case, upon proof of the partnership, the payment is binding-against it, even though the paper itself was not produced at the time the payment was made. Civil Code (1910), §§ 3180, 3179, 3172.

2. Where, under a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Swygert Bros. v. Bank of HaralsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. M. Fleshman & Co. v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  3. Flournoy & Epping v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  4. Pursley v. RamseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  5. Reliance Fertilizer Co. v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clarke v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  2. Futch v. Royster Guano Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Mustin v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API