Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Croom

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1985No. 845SC698PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The record indicates that Kimberly Joyce Croom appealed from the court’s judgment and assigned error. However, no appellant’s brief was filed in support of Kimberly’s appeal. Instead, counsel filed an appellee’s brief and attempted, pursuant to Rule 10(d) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, to cross-assign as error Kimberly’s exceptions noted at the time of her appeal.

Rule 10(d) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure permits an ap-pellee to cross-assign as error any actions of the trial court which deprive the appellee of an alternative basis in law for supporting the judgment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dunlap v. . IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1858

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boyce & Isley, PLLC v. CooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Tarlton v. StidhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API